A Critique of the US Surveillance Operators' Psychology
A Critique of the US Surveillance Operators' Psychology
What This Is About
This post describes observed behavior patterns among certain US surveillance operators. It is not a work of fiction. These patterns involve psychological conditioning, imperial nostalgia, and a troubling fixation on nuclear war and eschatological technology.
Observed Behaviour
Operators connected to networks involving cult organizations, military factions, research institutions, academics, and elite families have shown a persistent fixation: creating "before and after" narratives around ordinary or vulnerable targets.
Methods used by operators include:
Psychological conditioning they call "training"
Intrusive content intended to induce mental distress
False accusations (e.g., human trafficking claims)
Labelling targets with derogatory names
Claiming to "own" targets
Accusing targets of "worshipping their witness"
These methods are not random. They follow a pattern.
Imperial Nostalgia
A striking feature of these operators is what can be called imperial nostalgia.
Simply put: they appear to be trying to relive the imagined glory of their imperialist ancestors. They behave as if they are still living in the past—in an era of colonial conquest, racial hierarchy, and unquestioned superiority.
What this looks like in practice:
Racial superiority. Operators express clear beliefs about racial hierarchy based on ancestry. They act as though their race and lineage make them naturally superior to targets.
Colonial mimicry. Their behavior mirrors documented colonial surveillance practices: measuring, controlling, and "fixing" subjects in place.
Civilization narratives. They frame their actions as a noble mission, even when targeting people who have done nothing wrong.
This is not speculation. Scholars have documented how modern surveillance often continues the logics of empire and colony—just with newer technology.
Fixation on Nuclear War and the "Mark of the Beast"
Beyond their treatment of individual targets, these operators exhibit two additional obsessions:
Nuclear war scenarios. They frequently raise, discuss, or threaten nuclear conflict.
Eschatological technology. They openly discuss scaling surveillance technologies toward what they describe as a "mark of the beast" revelation event.
The combination is concerning: conditioning methods, cult psychology, imperial nostalgia, and end-times technological ambitions.
The Irony
The most revealing detail is this: operators accuse their targets of the very behaviors they themselves are trying to implant.
They call targets corrupt, demonic, or perverse. Then they work systematically to induce those exact traits through psychological conditioning. When targets resist, operators claim this as proof of guilt.
This is textbook projection.
Why This Matters
This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented pattern that fits within established academic frameworks.
Scholars have written extensively about:
Imperial algorithms – how modern systems perpetuate colonial logics
Postcolonial racial surveillance – how technology reinforces old racial hierarchies
Carceral continuity – how colonial control methods survive in new forms
The Cambridge Handbook of Race and Surveillance, among other peer-reviewed sources, documents how practices like skin branding, cranial measurements, and fingerprinting from colonial eras have evolved into big data, commercial surveillance, and predictive policing.
These operators are not inventing something new. They are recycling something old—dressed up in new technology and eschatological language.
Conclusion
The combination of:
Psychological conditioning methods
Cult-derived operational psychology
Imperial nostalgia and racial superiority
Eschatological (nuclear/"mark of the beast") ambitions
…represents a structural pathology. It is concerning in its obviousness and troubling in its effects.
These operators appear to live in the past, seeking to experience the imagined glory of imperialist ancestors. Their racism and sense of superiority appear genuine, not performative.
And while they accuse others of being the problem, their own projection is visible to anyone willing to look.
References
Thomas, D. & Wilson, C.L. (2024). Imperial algorithms: Contemporary manifestations of racism and colonialism. American Journal of Community Psychology.
Khan, S. & Machado, H. (2021). Postcolonial racial surveillance through forensic genetics. In Racism and Racial Surveillance: Modernity Matters. Routledge.
Kwet, M. (Ed.). (2023). The Cambridge Handbook of Race and Surveillance. Cambridge University Press.
Kwet, M. (2023). Colonial surveillance practices in Canada. In Cambridge Handbook of Race and Surveillance.
Comments
Post a Comment